tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC December 21, 2009 9:00pm-10:00pm EST
true american hero. >> i'm sorry. i'm just a guy who cares an awful lot about my country. >> holy -- >> thanks but no thanks on that bridge to nowhere. but that's not how i imagine it. in my imagination it's really bad. >> will sarah palin be named the wakiest whack job of the year? "countdown's" 2009 whack job jamboree debuts next tuesday, december 29th at 8:00 p.m. eastern. that will do it for this monday edition of "countdown."
i'm lawrence o'donnell. the rachel maddow show is up next. here it is the monday before christmas and it appears there will simply never be a slow news day again. i thought today would be so mellow. not so much. the health reform fight has gone beyond dramatic. senators moving from standard parliamentary procedures to at least appearing to pray for another senator to die. or at least praying that he become incapacitated. in the interview tonight we'll be joined by thomas friedman, three-time pulitzer prize winner from the "new york times." and we have a big followup on a report from friday night on senator john mccain. it's a followup we are only able to do because i think the american heroes who work at c-span must work all weekend even through giant snowstorms. by working all weekend through a
giant snowstorm, they have brought us lost and now found footage of john mccain doing something he says he never did. that is all ahead this hour. but we begin tonight with the united states senate as the most dysfunctional game of baseball ever played. in baseball you've got your home team and away team. right? right now in the senate the democrats are the home team. they've got 60 seats. they're the majority party in the senate. the senate floor is sort of their home field if you will. that of course makes the republicans the away team. and the way that it works in baseball is that when you are heading into the last inning, if the home team is winning, the away team gets one more crack at it. right? one more chance to make up the deficit and try to win the game. if they can't do it in their last at bat, sorry. game over. everybody hit the showers. well, for republicans, the past week has been their final at bat on health reform. their last chance to kill health reform and thereby win the big political game. the only way to win is to
prevent 60 democrats from uniting to beat the republican filibuster, preventing 60 democrats from uniting to move forward with a vote. that's the only way they can win. this past week was sort of the top of the 9th inning, the republicans' last at bat, their last hope. three outs to stop health reform. out one came on wednesday when joe lieberman signaled that he was not going to join their filibuster. >> i'm getting toward that position where i can say what i wanted to say all along that i'm ready to vote for health care reform. >> out two came on saturday when democrat ben nelson announced he wasn't going to join the filibuster either. >> the change is what's necessary in america today and that's why i intend to vote for cloture and vote for health care reform. >> that's two outs. top of the ninth. republicans losing but they've got one swing left.
up to the plate steps tom coburn. unable to score by getting nelson or lieberman on their side last night tom coburn swung for the fences. >> what the american people ought to pray is that somebody can't make the vote tonight. that's what they ought to pray. >> i'm not naming any names but one of these democrats is really old. really sick. he's been in and out of the hospital. it's late at night. it sure would be a shame if he couldn't make it. and with that creepy, creepy at bat, tom coburn and the republicans struck out. ailing 92-year-old democratic senator robert bird did in fact make it to the vote last night. republicans forced him to come to the senate chamber to vote. republicans did not come from behind to win. they failed in their last at bat in the top of the ninth. now, usually at this point in a baseball game, you don't bother playing the bottom half of the ninth inning. the home team is already winning. there's no point. the only thing that could possibly be achieved by playing
the bottom half of the ninth inning is that the winning team might run up the score even further or i guess somebody could get injured. there's no doubt about the outcome of this game. for all of its policy flaws, for all of the unseemly, legislative horse trading that's gone into making it happen, health reform is going to pass the senate. it is a done deal. democrats have their 60 votes. it's done, done, done. and yet in this most dysfunctional game of baseball ever played, republicans are demanding that the bottom of the ninth inning be played anyway. the senate could hold a final vote on health reform right now. at the drop of a hat it would pass, 60-40. but the senate is not doing that because republicans are keeping on keeping on with all of the delay tactics they can muster even though the outcome is a foregone conclusion. they know what the outcome is going to be. they're using arcane senate rules to stretch this thing out until at the very earliest 7:00 p.m. on christmas eve. they are playing a game they have no chance to win. should they continue to do that
when everyone knows what the outcome is going to be? shoulda, coulda, woulda. who am i to say? the fact is they are. during a closed door luncheon today senate republicans considered throwing in the towel but ultimately decided against it. republican senator john cornin saying, quote, we're fighting till the bitter end till hell freezes over and we're skating on the ice. what's going on right now in the senate, the reason today was the 22nd consecutive day the senate has been in session, is not because anything is going to change about the policy anymore. it's not because republicans have a chance to defeat the bill in the senate. this is purely because republicans believe it is good politics for them to be seen doing this thing that has no point. they think it makes them look good and think it must make democrats look bad. unfortunately for republicans, in pursuit of that, they have done stuff like delaying a vote on funding u.s. troops. democrats are now running a national tv ad hammering that decision today.
the delay tactics have also led to 92-year-old robert bird getting wheeled into the senate chamber at 1:00 a.m. on two separate occasions as tom coburn appeared to pray senator bird wouldn't be able to make it. this fight for health reform in the senate is over. democrats won. and rather than admitting certain defeat, republicans are forcing the full ninth inning to be played. if they can't score any more runs i guess they're hoping to bean a few batters. hoping someone sprains an ankle running the bases? anybody? joining us now is john stanton who has been covering every angle of the health care reform fight for "roll call" newspaper. your reporting has been invaluable to us. thanks for joining us to help us understand what's going on. >> sure thing. >> i know there was a meeting today among senate republicans where they discussed maybe throwing in the towel on the delay strategy. >> apparently the luncheon was called to get them together to talk about what to do next over the next couple weeks and my
understanding from some folks at the meeting was that several members have been feeling a lot of pressure to go home. they have families at home. some have missed a lot of fundraisers because they've been in for 22 straight days and they do a lot of fund raising on the weekends. when they didn't get to go home that's a lot of money they're not getting for re-election campaigns. folks are itchy to get home and some took their concerns to their leader senator mcconnell. senator mcconnell and the other leadership sort of rallied their troops so to speak and said, look. we sort of committed ourselves to this thing. we can't really back out now. and got everybody back onboard on staying in until christmas eve. >> given that the delaying in practical terms is sort of pointless, there does seem to be a foregone conclusion here, do you think they're going to be able to hang together on this all the way through christmas eve? are there possibilities for defections? >> this is interesting. it's the first time i've ever seen it like this. i've been doing this for more than ten years.
with the two parties as at each other but also united internally. normally, you get to a saturday vote and members are pretty quick to back out of whatever it is they're doing to force a saturday vote. we've now had several 1:00 in the morning votes. they've been in session with people speaking on the floor until 2:00 or 3:00 in the morning on a regular basis so i tend to believe that they're going to actually force this all the way through. >> what's been the effect on the democrats here? you described both parties as being sort of internally unified but the republicans are going scorched earth, it seems from the outside like it has unified the democrats in ways that other things have not. >> it really has. there was a meeting last week at the white house where all of the senate democrats went over to speak with president obama about the health care issue. they've been pretty divided on it. senator evan bayh who is not known for his fiery oratory gave a speech at this closed door meeting where he said listen, we have to come up with a deal. if we don't the only people that are going to win are the republicans. i don't want to see the
republicans win because we can't figure out a way to make this work. you know, coming out of that meeting a lot of the democrats sort of felt like that summed it up for everybody and brought it home for the entire conference. then you saw senator feingold decide to vote for cloture on the defense bill despite the fact he is very much an anti-war senator and senator nelson's deal came together shortly after. i think it has unified them. >> particularly coming from evan bayh who has been very comfortable to work with republicans on lots of things. >> he was one of the guys that was initially hesitant to get in on the deal on the health care bill too. >> republicans did shock a lot of people with their decision to filibuster that military funding bill last thursday night. do you know if that was a controversial decision among republicans? was there dissension within the republican caucus? >> there was a lot of dissension particularly for senator cochran from mississippi. he's the ranking member of the appropriations committee. he and senator denway who is a chairman have a gentleman's agreement that they don't vote
against appropriations bills. also getting an appropriator to vote against appropriations bills is difficult generally speaking but senator mcconnell and his team put the screws a little bit it sounds like on senator cochran and he ultimately decided to vote with republicans which is what made senator feingold have to end up voting for cloture. some of the other republicans at first were a little hesitant about it but in the end they feel like they're sort of known for being the national security party and feel they can take any kind of hit they may get from it. >> i guess we shall see. john stanton reporter for "roll call" newspaper. thanks for your time. look forward to having you back on the show. >> sure. >> the long struggle to get 60 votes in the senate wound up with a few super expensive, straight up payoffs. hundred million dollar arrangements with conserva-dems to buy their individual votes. whatever passes this body the senate has through this process proven conclusively that as an
institution it is busted, broken. there is something deeply wrong that wasn't wrong before. we'll talk about fixing it next with everyone's favorite child wonk. later we'll talk with "new york times" columnist thomas friedman. first, one thing about health reform. some are still firing away at the senate version of the bill saying it would be better to kill it and start over than pass something so flawed. the kill the bill caucus's liberal wing now includes markos moulitsas who says the bill doesn't qualify as reform and includes our frequent guest, the fire dog lake.com. jane has a petition out now to kill the senate bill calling it, quote, an ungodly mess of errors, loopholes, and massive giveaways. howard dean who had been saying the senate should kill the bill now says the senate should pass it so it can potentially be improved in the conference
committee which is where they combine the senate and the house bills and try to come up with some sort of compromise between them. even still dr. dean says he still doesn't like this thing which is damation through the faintest phrase. e brushes. dentist inspired cupping action sweeps away up to twice as much plaque as a regular manual brush. oral-b rechargeable brushes. starting at $22.
for a nationwide expansion of medicaid. senate health reform bill would make more people eligible for medicaid and under the bill every other state in the country will help pay for its own new medicaid patients. but not nebraska. nebraska is special. nebraska's new medicaid patients will be paid for 100% by the federal government. why are nebraska's medicaid patients so special? because the majority does not rule in the united states senate. because a 60-vote super majority is now required to pass anything in the united states senate. and of course more specifically because nebraska senator ben nelson is so conservative that he represents the 60th of those 60 votes that democrats needed to pass reform which makes all nebraskans very special. incidentally, there are a lot of free medicaid for nebraska type stories buried in the senate bill a lot of which are not particularly infuriating on policy grounds but more curious.
all indicate a whack process in the senate. thanks to montana senator max baucus for example residents of one small town, libby, montana, who have health problems caused by asbestos exposure from a now closed mineral mine there, those people will be eligible for medicare coverage and vermont senator bernie sanders won more than $10 billion for community health centers across the country at least two in his home state. when you absolutely need every single vote in your 60-member caucus you have to start meeting every single individual senator's demands at least those who choose to make them. this system, this idea that the senate can't pass any legislation without 60 votes allows the minority to exploit a senate rule in order to thwart the will of the majority, majorly. it also makes individual senators remarkably powerful if they choose to be obstructionist in their own right. the filibuster is not in the constitution but is a rule imposed on the senate by the
senate and its use has increased dramatically in recent years. here is a chart we've use bfd to illustrate the growing use/abuse of the filibuster. it shows how many times the senate voted on ending a filibuster in each session over the course of my lifetime starting in 1973. just to pick an arbitrary date when it happened 31 times. you look at the huge spike at the end of the graph, the 110th congress the first term after the democrats won control of the senate in 2006. suddenly the filibuster is on the able 112 times. here's another way to look at it. nobel prize winning economist paul krugman points to research which puts the filibuster into percentages. in the '60s only 8% of major legislation was affected by the filibuster or threat to filibuster. by the 1980s it was 27%. by 2007, 70% of all major legislation faced a filibuster threat. that's a kwan tate if change so big it's a qualitative change.
in other words, the 60-vote threshold might as well be an official senate rule now and that has of course policy implications that make no sense for the country at all. joining us now is "the washington post", ezra klein. thanks for coming on the show. appreciate it. senate democrats just operate under the assumption that they will need 60 votes for everything. do they have a choice? >> not really. you could have gone through reconciliation which is the other option but that means you can't do anything the way you normally would do it. it is an arcane process completely hemmed in by rules. you couldn't have insurance market relations, on and on. they do think they need 60 votes to pass any legislation normally. that's a very new fact in the senate. it didn't used to be like that. when lyndon johnson passed medicare they wrote a memo internally in his administration that just said you get 55 votes, you're done. nobody would write that memo in the obama administration. >> how did we get to this point?
obviously a decision was made to start using the filibuster in as i said a qualitatively different way, almost by definition something that was very rarely used, something that defined an extreme circumstance in the senate but there was this very clear pivot point after the 2006 mid terms for the 110th congress that it was going to be used all of the time. do we know anything about that decision? >> a bit. it's a mixture of rule changes and strategy changes. it begins with mike mansfield sort of a legendary old senate leader who creates something called dual tracking wherein it used to be if you filibustered everything came to a stop. it was like stopping a car in a one lane highway. dual tracking made it so you could filibuster something, do that a little while, come back, check in tomorrow, come back the day after that. the cost of filibustering got a lot lower. as that happened, people didn't really filibuster that much more. still by custom it wasn't done much. then you have gingrich and bob dole in the '90s who realize you
can overturn essentially the democratic majority by making them into a failure by you know the american people don't reward you if you don't get anything done. in the late sort of otts you have this situation in which it is just constant and part of that story is wild polarization of the country. you look at glenn beck, look at what's going on out there. there is no political upside to cooperating. i think what political scientists say on this now is you can have a system in which the minority party has either the incentive to see the majority fail or it has the power to make them fail. but you really can't run a country if they have both. >> yeah. well, this has been a subject of frustration to people in both parties at different times and at different, more or less convenient intervals. i know the gang of 14 idea came up when republicans felt like democrats in the minority in the senate were filibustering too many judicial nominees. the way they hammered out a deal on essentially making democrats approve all bush judicial nominees, almost all of them was by threatening to get rid of the filibuster all together.
how hard is it to get rid of the filibuster? i feel i've read a lot of different analysis about how many votes it would take and what process you would need to kill it if you wanted to. >> people disagree on this. what they do agree on is that if you tried to get rid of the filibuster what the minority would do is essentially bring the senate to a halt. the senate doesn't just run the filibuster. it also runs on what's called unanimous consent where everybody has to agree to do things. everybody has to agree. that's how, you know, folks held up health care reform in the beginning of the debate this time around. republicans could really stop the chamber as the democrats threatened in 2005 when bill frist read into the filibuster. what you would basically need to have is congress remember it is supposed to be an independent group of government and is supposed to act on major, going concerns. you have the two parties get together and decide we don't want it to be the case when in the majority we can't do any of the things we promised the american people we'd do. six years from today when we don't know who will be in power the filibuster phases out.
for that to happen you need congress to begin acting like a branch of government and not just an attachment or accessory of the president which hasn't been the case for sometime now. >> ezra klein of "the washington post" great to have your analysis. thanks for joining us. >> thank you. president obama called the climate change accord that was just reached in copenhagen an unprecedented breakthrough. on the interview which is coming up next we'll get a second opinion from someone who just got back from copenhagen. he is the "new york times" columnist thomas friedman. the sore nose issue. puffs plus with lotion is a more soothing tissue. so, at national, i go right past the counter... and you get to choose any car in the aisle.
choose any car? you cannot be serious! okay. seriously, you choose. go national. go like a pro. (announcer) they've been tested, built and driven like no other. and now they're being offered like no other. come to the winter event and get an exceptional offer on the mercedes-benz of your dreams. it's our way of showing a little holiday spirit. hurry before the offer ends january 4th.
our guest for the interview tonight is three-time pulitzer prize winning columnist for the "new york times" thomas friedman. he has just returned from the climate change conference in copenhagen. his book, "hot, flat, and crowded" has been updated and revised to discuss the financial meltdown of 2008 and it's now available in paperback. thanks very much for joining us tonight. >> great to be with you, rachel. thanks for having me. >> so, "hot, flat, and crowded" is about the potential for a green, economic revolution. i would love to hear your observations on what just happened in copenhagen in terms of its potential impact on the u.s. economy. >> well, i heard in the leadup that president obama called it an unprecedented breakthrough. i think it was more of an unprecedented breakdown. and that's sad in a way, rachel. this process goes back 17 years. this kind of u.n. process to try to get every country working simultaneously, each in its own way, to reduce their carbon
emissions. you just felt there in copenhagen that there were too many moving parts, too many countries, too little trust particularly with the two countries, rachel, at the core, the united states and china. each worried that if they cut a little more they'll give economic advantage to the other. what i basically have been arguing is that i think we have to come home, focus on our own energy bill, make it the best bill we can, get a price on carbon through cap and trade or carbon tax, whatever can get through the senate, and let's launch our own green revolution because honestly i believe, rachel, more people will emulate us if we do the right thing and lead on this issue. more people will actually emulate us than under the compulsion of a treaty. >> your narrative on global warming is mostly that if we put a domestic price on pollution, if we as you say really get our own energy bill right, the resulting market forces will force us to get really green really fast. do you think that could be a huge economic boon to the u.s.
but on the other side the ones who aren't just arguing global warming is a hollywood liberal hoax are saying a price on carbon would be economically devastating. what do you think about those arguments? >> well, it's an important question and the, i'm actually writing my column for wednesday about this so if you don't tell anybody i'll share it with you. >> whisper. yeah. >> so the best example of that is actually denmark. back in 1973, when the first oil embargo was imposed two countries were hit most, the united states and denmark because it had a very pro israeli. denmark at the time was 99% dependent on middle east oil. today they're zero dependent on middle east oil partly because they discovered some oil and gas but basically they imposed a whole range of energy taxes. co2 taxes, carbon taxes. what was the result? well, now, you know, more than 30 years later, denmark has the highest energy efficiency in europe. they have reduced their carbon emissions. most importantly, rachel, they have launched a clean tech
industry, 1 of every 3 wind turbines in the world today are made by a danish company. the two leading biofuel companies, danish companies. this year i believe 11% of denmark's exports will be from clean tech companies. but the way they did it was that they put these taxes on and they did it in a revenue neutral way and then rebated them in different ways to incentives to companies and consumers so the companies would make the products, the consumers would buy them, and they would start to get scale to make an export industry. >> you think it could, you think that a major adjustment could be made toward recreating a manufacturing sector, all of the other things that would need to happen in the united states in order to do this. you think it could happen without a shock essentially. we could do this without having to pay a cost that didn't -- that only reaped dividends later? >> absolutely. i think obviously you'd phase it in. there are smart ways to do this especially if you make it revenue neutral. i think it would be palatable to a wider range of people.
whenever i get into the kind of climate and global warming debate i always hold up my book and it says hot -- you don't believe in hot? okay. no problem. got an eraser? erase hot. just in what i call a flat and crowded world where more people can see how we live, aspire to how we live and actually have our jobs now and a world that is going populationwise from 6.7 billion today to 9.2 billion projected by the year 2050, just in that world there's going to be so many americans, so many people consuming like us, eating like us, driving like us, clean tech, you know, energy efficiency has got to be the next great global industry. and the country that owns clean tech is going to have the most energy security, environmental security, innovative companies and i think global respect and that country has to be us. >> at the end of 2009, now, looking back not just at the year but at the decade, a lot of international observers are saying this decade was pretty grim for america and not just because of 9/11 because a lot of reasons but pretty good for countries like china, india, brazil.
those were the countries incidentally that snuck around in copenhagen and met behind president obama's back. in thinking about not only the challenge of leadership in the new economy and the new world that recognizes the imperative of the global warming gives us but thinking about our leadership role in the world what do you make of the fact that these major countries are colluding against us secretly on an issue like global warming? >> you know, it's scary but a sign of the times. i was staying at the crown plaza hotel in copenhagen near the conference center. they had a monorail running back and forth all day. if you wanted to go into copenhagen it came every ten minutes. i could call home, call my office, my wife, anywhere anytime from copenhagen. i come home and landed in newark airport. it's like flying from the jetsons to the flintstones. you know? your cell phone goes out half the time from newark to washington, d.c. we need nation building at home now. and i really think this can be the key.
but to pick up on where you and ezra left off, one of the real, and this gets to the china question, one of the frustrating things for me right now is that there's only one thing worse than one-party autocracy what china has and that's one party democracy. that's what we have in america. one party is playing and one isn't at all. you can order optimal solutions from the top down but you have to get all 60 votes as you were talking about from one party. well, votes one through 50 cost you a lot. votes 50 to 59 cost a fortune. wow. vote 60 is called ben nelson and that's a giveaway to the whole state of nebraska. and so you basically have this in the health bill that you were talking about but you also have it in the climate bill. that if there were six, eight republicans who were ready to join this bill, the giveaways to coal and the legacy industries in this country could really be minimized. and so we're going to get a suboptimal bill. how long can we as a country
thrive when our chief competitor can order from the top down optimal and we can only produce suboptimal? >> author, pulitzer prize winner, and columnist for the "new york times" thomas friedman. the book is called "hot, flat, and crowded." really appreciate your time. thanks. okay. attention bronze gods and god eses. there is a tax on tanning that is on the way. and the jaw-dropping story about a guy being described as a straight up con man who apparently punked the bush administration into ratcheting up the terror alert level six years ago today. these are two stories in other words about things inappropriately turning orange. both on the way. account - for free! tdd# 1-800-345-2550 yup, schwab clients can trade any of these tdd# 1-800-345-2550 w exchange-traded funds, online... commission-free! tdd# 1-800-345-2550 trade large-cap... for free. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 trade small-cap... for free. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 trade international... for free. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 trade one, trade a few... tdd# 1-800-345-2550 ...for free! tdd# 1-800-345-2550 only schwab clients.
just 2 aleve can last all day. perfect. choose aleve and you can be taking four times... fewer pills than extra strength tylenol. just 2 aleve have the strength to relieve arthritis pain all day. [ female announcer ] trying to be smart with the family budget? here goes the good old steam. [ pfffft! ] whooa!!!! [ female announcer ] let bounty help... because it cleans the mess with less than the bargain brands. it's thick and absorbent. and really durable. in lab tests bounty absorbs twice as much as the bargain brand. [ steam hisses ] why use more when you can use less? bring it. with bounty. the thick quicker picker-upper. and try bounty napkins. now with new prints. and this is the chevy traverse. it has more cargo space than pilot. and traverse beats honda on highway gas mileage too. more fuel efficient and 30% more room. maybe traverse can carry that stuff too.
ow during the chevy red tag event, get an '09 traverse with 0 percent apr for 72 months. see red and save green. now at your local chevy dealer. still ahead, six years ago today the bush administration apparently got punked. the country got the bejesus scared out of it. tonight we know exactly how. an incredible story. and after a blizzard forced airlines to cancel more than 3,000 flights, there are some welcome news for anyone who has ever spent hours stuck on a
plane on the ground. that is all coming up. but first a couple holy mackerel stories in today's news. anyone unhappy with the removal of the public option from the senate reform bill? anyone unhappy about that but who hasn't given up hope that it will one day still become a reality? might want to consider hiring a lobbyist who works for cosmetic surgeons because they are really good at getting what they want. before the senate voted on the reform bill in the wee hours of the morning majority leader harry reid made a few changes. he took out a 5% tax on elective plastic surgery because plastic surgeons complained the tax discriminated against middle class women. hum. the senate then replaced the cosmetic surgery tax with a 10% tax on tanning. the cosmetic surgery tax was given the nickname the bo-tax. the new tax will be known as the snooky. finally, some very good news. we can now show you something that we used to think was lost and gone forever.
back in 2002 when the senate was debating whether to give president bush authorization to go to war in iraq, democratic senator mark dayton of minnesota delivered an impassioned speech against the war. against giving president bush authorization to use force. and then something happened toward the end of his next appearance on the senate floor. >> i'm not a legal scholar but i cited the -- in using my, making my comments the opinion of the counsel at the library of congress, the congressional research service which -- >> it just -- like it just goes to black. this is the c-span archives. that never happens. it just goes to black. the reason we were even looking for that piece of c-span footage in the first place for friday's show was because senator john mccain made a big public show of
how outraged he was that democrats were not letting anyone have any extra time in the senate to finish their remarks. they were doing that in order to keep the senate ontrack to pass health reform by christmas. senator mccain said he had never in all his many years in the senate ever seen a senator denied just a little bit of extra time to finish his or her remarks. never. >> i've been around here 20 some years. first time i've ever seen a member denied the, an extra minute or two to finish his remarks. and i must say that i don't know what's happening here in this body but i think it's wrong. i've never seen a member denied an extra minute or so as the chair just did. >> the reason we were looking for that missing c-span clip is that the transcript from that day indicated it would have shown john mccain personally denying a senator a little extra time back in 2002. but as we explained on friday night the tape was just lost.
it went to black right at that critical moment. now i am so excited to tell you, the footage has been found. it has been restored. the american heroes at c-span apparently saw our segment on friday or at least heard about it and they contacted our producers today and gave us this statement explaining what happened. quote, c-span video library content created prior to 2003 was originally captured on two-hour vhs videotapes which were later digitalized for permanent storage in our archives. this process is occasionally susceptible to small errors that can occur at top of the hour tape changes. an example of this type of error was discovered in the digital online file from the u.s. senate floor proceedings of october 10th, 2002, at noon eastern. that was when mccain was doing the thing with that senator. all right. now get this. this is amazing. quote, we have redigitalized and reposted this particular senate session directly from the
original analog tapes. yes! when we figured out about this glitch the folks at c-span went back to the original vhs tapes from 2002. they redigitalized and reposted the missing clip, god bless them, and over the weekend with the big snowstorm, ah. without further ado we may now bring you the precedent established by senator john mccain for the very thing john mccain swore was unprecedented. >> i also am not a legal scholar but i cited the, in using my, making my comments the opinion of the congressional research service which o pined and i realize lawyers and others -- >> your time is expired. >> ask for 30 seconds to complete my -- >> objection is heard. >> i object. either senator mccain cannot remember that he himself objected to a senator getting an extra 30 seconds to finish his
remarks during the iraq war debate or senator mccain knows perfectly well this stuff happens in the senate. it happens and he just said it was unprecedented out of sheer hack-i-tude. i have to say, i love c-span, really. i love you guys. you are perfect in every way. never change. and a fresh breath feeling that lasts up to five times longer. [ inhales ] my breath still feels fresh. and how could i resist that smile. [ female announcer ] new crest extra white plus scope outlast.
[ male announcer ] for a better-looking tomorrow. vicks nyquil cold & flu. the nighttime sniffling, sneezing, coughing, aching, fever, best sleep you ever got with a cold...medicine. ♪ quick followup to my discussion with tom friedman about the climate change summit in copenhagen. the former half-term governor of alaska and former vice presidential candidate sarah palin has summarized her analysis of the copenhagen summit on twitter. she tweeted, quote, copenhagen equals arrogance of man 2 think we can change nature's ways. must be good stewards of god's earth but arrogant and naive 2 say man overpowers nature. then 13 minutes after that, another epiphany. quote, earth saw --
country. >> america is on high alert tonight just four days before christmas the secretary of homeland security tom ridge announced that the government has raised the terror threat level from yellow or elevated to orange, which is high. >> and to make sure the american people didn't miss the message, in case the color orange was insufficiently frightening homeland security secretary tom ridge upped the tension by evoking the specter of the worst terrorist attack on american soil. saying, quote, strategic indicators are perhaps now greater than at any point since september 11, 2001. so what were those strategic indicators that caused the grounding of flights, presence of police and heavy assault gear on new york city streets, the dispatching of scientists to monitor radiation levels in major cities? >> the u.s. intelligence community has received a substantial increase in the volume of threat related intelligence reports. these credible sources suggest
the possibility of attacks against the homeland around the holiday season and beyond. >> you know, i know this is, i know how the story ends up. and i know that was a long time ago, six years ago today, but even watching this footage now i feel a little scared watching it. who were these so-called credible sources that brought up this reaction from the government? turns out it was one source who as it turns out may have been sort of a con man. it's a man named dennis montgomery, chief technology officer of a software company who acovereding to my next guest's reporting managed to convince the cia he could detect magic bar coded messages from al qaeda hidden inside broadcast signals from al jazeera. mr. montgomery reportedly claimed that he alone could not only read those signals but translate them and he could translate them into latitudes, longitudes and flight numbers supposedly of the planes and targets that al qaeda would use to strike again, all buried
inside al jazeera's transmissions. if you think this idea sounds a little far fetched the cia cia didn't at first. but eventually they got suspicious. french officials hired another company to check this guy's work, to try to re-create what it was he said he was doing. and to find the things he said he was translating. they discovered that those magic bar codes were never there in the first place. joining us now is a journalist who has pieced together this amazing story, publicished in of all places, playboy magazine. aaron, thanks for being here. >> i should also mention you are also author of the man who pushed america to war. i want to qualify my conclusion this this guy seems like a conman. you don't report that. what you report is that this was a really weird contract for the united states government to have taken on. what made -- what exactly did he convince the cia he could do?
>> he in essence convinced them he had this magic technology that could predict terrorist attacks. and there always was an urgent threat he was finding in rushing to the cia. there was an imperative act opinion it was a special group within the cia he convinced. it was a small number of people that knew who he was, and was a slightly larger group of people who knew what this intelligence even was. they didn't want to reveal the sort of bizarre source of all this, this idea that it was somehow secretly encoded in al jazeera. the people who knew the most didn't believe it. >> this information that he was predicting made it all the way to the top, because we did get that nationwide terror alert six-years ago today. are the people who made the decision to act in such a massive and expensive and fear inducing way, did they not know what his methods were? even a basic description of his methods, sounds like harry
potter. >> no, they didn't know. he apparently refused to reveal how he was finding it. that was proprietary secret information for him. >> which gets to the larger issue about contractors doing basic fundamental government work. if it's proprietary technology, then nobody can check their work, right? >> exactly. it's against the idea that if you can keep a secret small enough, can you never confirm if the intelligence is true or false. classified information, nobody knew what the source was, so nobody could say, this makes no sense, folks. >> the terror alert lasted until the middle of january. do we know what made homeland security finally decide there wasn't a credible threat any more? >> back then they finally -- first of all, it's also classified. these people can't talk about it. even if they all know it was false intelligence, they're not allowed to talk about it.
but it was finally deemed noncredible. >> one of the things you report, which is sort of the kicker in this intire stoentire story, is same guy, and his magical predicting software which may or may not exist, has another government contract right now. has been taken on by another part of the u.s. government. how did you find that out, and what is that contract? >> it's not right now. he goes through financiers. he had one financier, and then there was a woman named edra, who was married to a famous billionaire. tim blitza, she became his financier. the most recent contract, 2009 for $3 million from the u.s. air force.
and it's -- there is evidence that the people knew that the air force knew that the cia deemed this guy not credible. there is evidence. >> but the contract is over? >> it is. >> aram roster has reported on the incredible magic, al jazeera bar code exam in the war on terror. this is fascinating. thank you for joining us. coming up on "countdown" maxine waters lays out just what might happen with the senate health care bill. next on this show, airlines can only keep you waiting on a hot, stuffy, unsanitary plane on the tarmac for three long hours. igu, or award-winning cc for practically just your signature. and volkswagen even covers scheduled maintenance at no cost. it can't be that easy. [ engine revs ] [ tires screech ] [ seat humming ]
[ engine revs ] [ seat humming ] [ seat humming ] [ pen scratches ] that was pretty easy. [ male announcer ] sign then drive is back. hurry in and get legendary volkswagen value for practically just your signature. ♪ and you're still fighting to sleep in the middle of the night, why would you go one more round using it ? you don't need a rematch-- but a re-think-- with lunesta. lunesta is different. it keys into receptors that support sleep, setting your sleep process in motion. lunesta helps you get the restful sleep you need. when taking lunesta, don't drive or operate machinery until you feel fully awake. walking, eating, driving or engaging in other activities while asleep without remembering it the next day have been reported. abnormal behaviors may include aggressiveness, agitation, hallucinations or confusion. in depressed patients, worsening of depression, including risk of suicide, may occur. alcohol may increase these risks. allergic reactions such as tongue or throat swelling occur rarely and may be fatal.
side effects may include unpleasant taste, headache, dizziness and morning drowsiness. stop fighting with your sleep. get a free 7-night trial on-line and ask your doctor about switching to lunesta. discover a restful lunesta night. so, at national, i go right past the counter... and you get to choose any car in the aisle. choose any car? you cannot be serious! okay. seriously, you choose. go national. go like a pro. that's over 300 million people. i've collected a few postcards of all the places that at&t has coverage... spokane, washington; boston, mass. san francisco, tulsa, oklahoma... dated a girl from there. warren, michigan... didn't work out. bozeman, montana; daytona beach, florida; madison, wisconsin... good college town. i think we get the picture. (announcer) if you want coverage, we've got it. at&t. this holiday, get a touchscreen samsung solstice free after mail-in rebate.
but you can take home that dentist smooth clean feeling with oral-b rechargeable brushes. dentist inspired cupping action sweeps away up to twice as much plaque as a regular manual brush. oral-b rechargeable brushes. starting at $22. oral-b rechargeable brushes. let the all-new campbellskitchen.com help bring your family to the table this holiday. from timeless favorites like campbell's green bean casserole to new classics like swanson herb roasted turkey with pan gravy and pepperidge farm holiday brie en croute even clever ideas that give leftovers a full makeover. for inspiration, family pleasing recipes and 15 dollars in valuable coupons, explore the all-new campbellskitchen.com for a very happy holiday.